Political Democracy and Militarized Conflict in Evolving Interstate Rivalries
نویسنده
چکیده
In this paper I study the relationship between political democracy, interstate rivalry, and militarized interstate conflict. Past research has shown dyadic democracy to have a strong pacifying effect on relations between states; democracies have rarely if ever gone to war against each other. Much of the research in this area has been static and cross-sectional in nature, though, overlooking the history of relations between the states in question. Recent research on interstate rivalry has suggested that relations between adversaries tend to become increasingly hostile and conflictual as the adversaries accumulate a longer history of past conflict and rivalry. Particularly important for the present study, two adversaries are more likely to become involved in further episodes of future conflict in the future when they have accumulated a lengthier history of past conflict. This evolutionary approach to interstate conflict and rivalry suggests that the pacifying effects if dyadic democracy may decrease over time in ongoing interstate relationships, as the adversaries become involved in more confrontations and accumulate hostility and grievances toward each other from these multiple confrontations. The paper begins by laying out the general theoretical framework of an evolutionary approach to interstate conflict and rivalry, and by formulating a series of hypotheses on how an evolving interstate relationship should affect the relationship between democracy and conflict. These hypotheses are then tested statistically, using logistic regression analysis. The analyses suggest that dyadic democracy has not been entirely effective at preventing the recurrence of conflict between former adversaries, particularly for contiguous adversaries. These results suggest the need for further research on the introduction of democracy into an ongoing conflictual relationship, and for continued caution in applying the democratic peace proposition to policymaking.
منابع مشابه
Hensel THE DEMOCRATIC PEACE AND RIVALRIES
This paper reexamines the democratic peace in a longitudinal fashion. We extend the democratic peace proposition beyond isolated militarized disputes or wars to longer-term interstate rivalries. Rivalries of all types are rare among democratic dyads; there is only one case of enduring rivalry between consistently democratic states, and most conflictual relationships between democracies remain c...
متن کاملTheory and Evidence on Geography and Conflict Geography and the Frequency of Militarized Conflict Tests of the Territoriality Perspective
1 Most research on the sources of militarized conflict between nation-states has emphasized characteristics of the states themselves or of the larger interstate system, with little emphasis on the geographic context of relations between states. Vasquez (1998), for example, finds that realist variables such as capabilities and alliances account for most variables and hypotheses used in quantitat...
متن کاملDomestic Political Constraints and Interstate Rivalry Processes
Most large-N research on recurrent interstate conflict and rivalry has downplayed the role of domestic politics, either overlooking the domestic political context within states entirely or mentioning domestic politics only implicitly. This paper presents a more domestically-grounded theoretical model of recurrent conflict and rivalry, focusing explicitly on the domestic political actors and pro...
متن کاملA Neural Network Analysis of Militarized Disputes, 1885-1992: Temporal Stability and Causal Complexity
Great progress has been made in predicting and explaining interstate conflict. Improved data, theory, and methods all deserve credit. Yet much remains to be done. First, whereas many variables (e.g., geographical proximity, relative power, alliances, political regime type, economic interdependence) have important effects, even the most successful multivariate analyses leave much of the variance...
متن کاملThe Democratic Peace Unraveled: It’s the Economy
Recent studies show that the democratic peace correlation is not significant once the potentially confounding variable that can cause both democracy and peace, contract-intensive economy, is considered; this pattern holds in analyses of wars, fatal militarized interstate conflicts (Mousseau 2009), and interstate crises (Mousseau et al. 2013). These studies rescind the primary evidence for democ...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 1995